Dr. Daniel Pompa — chiropractor-turned-wellness entrepreneur — has built a large following around detox protocols, cellular healing programs, and supplement sales. But alongside his public profile, a documented legal history has raised questions from consumers, former employees, and state regulators. This guide covers every verified legal action against Dr. Pompa and his associated companies, what each case actually involved, and what you need to know before engaging with his programs. crepe erase lawsuit
There is currently no active consumer class action settlement involving Dr. Pompa or Pompa Program, LLC. Any website claiming otherwise is fabricating information. What does exist is a 2013 state licensing action and an active 2025 California employee lawsuit — both covered in full below. DKOldies Lawsuit: 2026 Complete Guide
Dr. Pompa Legal Actions at a Glance
| Case | Year | Type | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| PA Chiropractic Board — License Suspension | 2013 | State regulatory/disciplinary | Resolved via consent order |
| Connors v. Pompa Program, LLC | 2025 | Labor/employment (FLSA + CA state claims) | Active — remanded to CA state court July 2025 |
| Consumer/FTC complaints | Ongoing | Consumer complaints via BBB | No confirmed FTC enforcement action filed |
Case 1: The 2013 Pennsylvania Chiropractic License Suspension
What Happened
This is the most significant and fully documented legal action against Dr. Pompa. In May 2013, the Pennsylvania State Board of Chiropractic issued a disciplinary order against Daniel D. Pompa, D.C. (License No. DC006390L) following a consent agreement with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s Department of State, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs.
The board suspended his Pennsylvania chiropractic license — and all other authorizations to practice — for five years. Under the terms of the consent order, the suspension was to be automatically stayed in favor of probation after two years, provided he met the board’s conditions.
The Grounds
According to Pennsylvania’s official May 2013 disciplinary report, Pompa’s license was suspended because he committed immoral or unprofessional conduct by means of acts involving moral turpitude, dishonesty or corruption, and he pled nolo contendere to felonies in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
A nolo contendere plea — also called “no contest” — means the defendant did not formally admit guilt but accepted the disciplinary outcome without contesting the charges. Pennsylvania’s consent order records confirm Pompa agreed to the terms in the interests of a prompt and final resolution rather than disputing the proceedings. The disciplinary action covered both his primary chiropractic license (DC006390L) and his adjunctive procedures license (AJ006390L).
Timeline of Key Events
| Date | Event | Details |
|---|---|---|
| October 3, 1995 | PA chiropractic license originally issued | License No. DC006390L |
| 2013 | Nolo contendere plea to PA felony charges | Specific charges not spelled out in public board records |
| May 2, 2013 | Pennsylvania Board disciplinary order effective | 5-year suspension |
| ~May 2015 | Suspension automatically stayed in favor of probation | Subject to board conditions being met |
| ~May 2018 | End of 5-year suspension period | License eligible for reinstatement |
| 2025 | License listed as active in provider databases | Clinical practice is no longer his primary activity |
What This Means for Consumers
A state medical board suspension is a serious public record. The consent order appears as a permanent part of his licensing history. His Pennsylvania chiropractic license appears to have been reinstated after the suspension period concluded — provider databases as of 2025 list it as active. But Dr. Pompa has largely transitioned away from clinical chiropractic practice into online coaching, courses, and supplements — businesses that do not require a chiropractic license, and which are subject to different regulatory oversight.
Case 2: The 2025 Employee Lawsuit — Connors v. Pompa Program, LLC
What the Lawsuit Is About
In April 2025, two former workers — Felicia Connors and Haley Rice — filed a civil complaint against Pompa Program, LLC in Orange County Superior Court in California. This is a labor and employment lawsuit, not a consumer case.
On April 16, 2025, Felicia Connors filed a civil labor and employment lawsuit against Pompa Program, LLC in Orange County Superior Courts, Orange County Civil Complex Center. The complaint was filed as a class action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, suggesting additional current or former employees may have had similar experiences. Popeyes Lawsuit Guide
The Federal Removal and Dismissal
After the original state court filing, the defendants removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (Case No. 8:25-cv-01493) in July 2025 — a common maneuver used when a complaint includes federal law claims.
The court ordered that plaintiffs’ cause of action for claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act be dismissed without prejudice, and the action remanded to the Superior Court. The dismissal was “without prejudice,” meaning the plaintiffs could potentially refile those federal claims. The case returned to California state court, where it remains active.
Case Timeline
| Date | Event | Court |
|---|---|---|
| April 16, 2025 | Original complaint filed | Orange County Superior Court, CA |
| July 9, 2025 | Case removed to federal court | U.S. District Court, C.D. California |
| July 28, 2025 | FLSA claims dismissed without prejudice; case remanded | Federal court (Judge Autumn D. Spaeth) |
| August 18, 2025 | Case Management Conference scheduled | Orange County Superior Court |
| Present | CA state labor claims ongoing | Orange County Superior Court |
Key Parties
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Felicia Connors | Lead plaintiff |
| Haley Rice | Co-plaintiff |
| Pompa Program, LLC | Defendant |
| Holland & Hart | Defense law firm |
| Judge Autumn D. Spaeth | Presided over federal phase |
What This Case Means — and Doesn’t Mean
This is an active, ongoing employee dispute. It involves allegations between workers and the company about labor practices — not health program outcomes, supplement quality, or consumer refunds. If you’re a former Pompa Program employee in California who experienced wage or labor violations, this case may be relevant to your situation and you should consult a California employment attorney.
This case has no consumer claim filing portal, no settlement fund, and no compensation deadline for program customers.
Consumer Complaints and Regulatory Scrutiny
BBB Complaints
Pompa Program, LLC holds a profile with the Better Business Bureau but is not BBB Accredited. Consumer complaints on the BBB and third-party review platforms raise recurring concerns, including:
- High program costs, with reported prices from approximately $2,000 to $9,000+
- Difficulty obtaining refunds after enrolling
- Use of non-medically credentialed “health coaches” instead of licensed physicians
- A proprietary enrollment urine test that critics allege always returns alarming results regardless of the individual’s actual health status
- Claims of a guaranteed outcome, followed by blaming the client’s non-compliance when the program doesn’t produce results
These are consumer experiences, not adjudicated legal findings. They are worth reading before spending significant money on any health program. If you believe you were misled, the FTC complaint portal at reportfraud.ftc.gov is the appropriate regulatory channel.
FTC Scrutiny: What’s Confirmed vs. What Isn’t
Companies associated with Dr. Pompa have faced scrutiny from the FTC regarding advertising claims and marketing tactics, particularly those related to health benefits and income opportunities. However, no confirmed, publicly announced FTC enforcement action, consent decree, or formal complaint specifically targeting Dr. Pompa or Pompa Program, LLC has been verified as of February 2026. “Scrutiny” and an actual enforcement action are two very different things legally.
Under FTC guidelines, any program claiming to treat, reverse, or cure specific diseases must have competent and reliable scientific evidence supporting those claims. Kyleena IUD Side Effects, Risks & Legal Options
Who Is Dr. Daniel Pompa? Background and Credentials
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Credential | Doctor of Chiropractic (D.C.) |
| PA License No. | DC006390L |
| PA License Originally Issued | October 3, 1995 |
| Business Entity | Pompa Program, LLC |
| Registered Location | Draper, Utah |
| Primary Business Activities | Online health coaching, fasting programs, supplement sales, practitioner training |
Daniel Pompa holds a Doctor of Chiropractic degree — a legitimate professional doctorate. However, “Dr.” in this context does not mean medical doctor. Chiropractors are licensed healthcare providers, but their traditional scope covers musculoskeletal issues. They are not licensed to diagnose systemic disease or prescribe pharmaceutical treatments in the way medical physicians are.
When Dr. Pompa makes claims about treating chronic illness, heavy metal toxicity, cellular inflammation, or metabolic disease, those claims go beyond the standard scope of chiropractic practice. That distinction matters when you’re evaluating whether his program is an appropriate substitute for medical care.
What to Do If You Have Concerns
If You Enrolled in the Program and Feel Misled
- Save everything — emails, receipts, program materials, and any written promises
- Request a refund in writing via email — documented paper trails matter
- File a BBB complaint at bbb.org — this creates a public record the company must respond to
- Report to the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov
- Contact your state attorney general’s consumer protection division — most states have one with a free complaint portal
- Dispute through your credit card — if the charge was recent, a chargeback may be possible depending on your card’s terms and purchase timing
- Consult a consumer protection attorney — many offer free initial consultations
If You’re a Former Employee in California
The Connors v. Pompa Program, LLC case is active in Orange County Superior Court. If you were employed by Pompa Program, LLC in California and experienced wage or labor violations, consult a California employment attorney. You can also file a wage complaint directly with the California Labor Commissioner’s Office at dir.ca.gov.
If You’re Researching Before Joining
| Question to Ask First | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Who will I actually work with — a physician or a coach? | Coaches are not licensed to diagnose or treat disease |
| What is the full cost and the refund policy, in writing? | Many complaints cite difficulty obtaining refunds |
| What peer-reviewed evidence supports the specific health claims? | FTC requires competent scientific evidence for disease-related claims |
| Is the enrollment urine test validated by an independent lab? | Critics allege the test produces alarming results regardless of the individual’s health |
| Is this program a substitute for, or supplement to, working with a licensed doctor? | Wellness programs are not a replacement for medical diagnosis |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a Dr. Pompa class action lawsuit consumers can join?
No. As of February 2026, there is no active consumer class action settlement with a claim filing portal or payout fund. The only active lawsuit involving Pompa Program, LLC is an employee labor dispute — consumers are not parties to that case and there is no claim deadline or compensation pool for program customers.
What were the felony charges behind the 2013 license suspension?
The Pennsylvania board’s public consent order confirms Pompa pled nolo contendere to felonies in Pennsylvania, with the board finding he engaged in “unprofessional conduct” involving “moral turpitude, dishonesty, or corruption.” The specific underlying charges are not spelled out in publicly accessible board documents. A nolo contendere plea is not an admission of guilt — it means he did not formally contest the charges while accepting the disciplinary outcome.
Does Dr. Pompa still have a valid chiropractic license?
According to publicly available provider databases last updated in 2025, Pennsylvania License No. DC006390L is listed as active. The 5-year suspension issued in May 2013 would have concluded around 2018. His current primary activities — online coaching, supplements, and practitioner training — do not require a chiropractic license.
Has the FTC taken formal action against Dr. Pompa?
No confirmed, publicly announced FTC enforcement action against Dr. Pompa or Pompa Program, LLC has been verified as of February 2026. Multiple sources cite general “FTC scrutiny” without pointing to a specific docketed case, consent decree, or public settlement.
What is the Connors lawsuit specifically about?
It’s a California labor and employment case filed by two former Pompa Program employees alleging violations that originally included federal Fair Labor Standards Act claims. Those FLSA claims were dismissed without prejudice in July 2025, and the remaining California state labor claims are active in Orange County Superior Court.
Is Dr. Pompa a “real” doctor?
He holds a Doctor of Chiropractic (D.C.) degree, which is a legitimate professional doctorate obtained after graduate-level clinical training. However, a D.C. is distinct from a medical doctor (M.D.) or doctor of osteopathy (D.O.). When evaluating his program’s claims about treating systemic disease or chronic illness, understanding that distinction is important.
Where can I find the official court documents?
The 2025 federal case (8:25-cv-01493) is publicly accessible via PACER at pacer.gov. The Pennsylvania 2013 consent order has been published by organizations including the Center for Inquiry and Lyme Science. Pennsylvania board disciplinary actions are also searchable through the PA Department of State’s license verification system.
Can I get legal help if I believe I was harmed by the program?
Yes. Many consumer protection attorneys offer free initial consultations. Whether an individual claim is viable depends on what was promised, what you paid, what happened, and your state’s laws. You can request a free attorney referral by emailing [email protected].
If the Connors employee case settles, can consumers file claims?
No. If that employee class action ever settles, it would affect current and former California employees of Pompa Program, LLC — not consumers who purchased the health program. It would not create a consumer compensation fund.
What if I think my situation involves fraud?
You should consult a consumer protection attorney and file reports with the FTC and your state attorney general. Document all communications, payments, and any specific promises made during the sales process. If you paid by credit card, contact your card issuer about a potential chargeback.
The Bottom Line
The verified legal record around Dr. Daniel Pompa includes one serious regulatory action — a 2013 Pennsylvania chiropractic license suspension after his nolo contendere plea to felony charges — and one active California employee lawsuit that is an internal labor dispute, not a consumer case.
What the record does not include, as of February 2026, is any confirmed consumer class action settlement, active FTC enforcement action, or court judgment related to his health programs or supplements.
Consumer complaints on the BBB and review platforms are real and documented. They don’t carry the legal weight of court judgments, but they represent the experiences of real people who spent significant money on the program and felt misled. Reading them carefully before committing thousands of dollars is time well spent.
If you’re a former employee with California labor claims, there is an active case worth following. If you’re a consumer who feels harmed, the right channels are the FTC, your state attorney general, and a consumer protection attorney — not a class action claim portal, because one doesn’t exist yet.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal guidance specific to your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state. All information reflects publicly available records as of February 2026.
