The Crepe Erase lawsuit — or more precisely, the wave of consumer legal actions connected to Crepe Erase and its parent company Guthy-Renker LLC — centers on three main complaints: deceptive advertising claims, aggressive automatic-renewal billing practices, and allegations that the product caused skin reactions in some users. Guthy-Renker has faced confirmed multi-million-dollar settlements related to its subscription billing practices, and consumer complaints about Crepe Erase specifically remain active as of 2026. crepe erase lawsuit
Here’s the most important thing to know upfront: there is no currently open, court-approved Crepe Erase-specific class action settlement accepting new claims as of February 2026. Many sites imply you can “file a claim today” — that’s misleading. What does exist are real legal avenues for affected consumers, a history of confirmed settlements worth tens of millions of dollars, and ongoing litigation. This guide covers all of it, honestly. Balance of Nature Lawsuit

Quick Answer The Crepe Erase lawsuit refers to multiple consumer actions against Guthy-Renker LLC (Crepe Erase’s manufacturer) alleging deceptive advertising, unauthorized auto-billing, and skin irritation. Guthy-Renker has settled past billing-related lawsuits totaling over $23 million. Those specific settlements are closed. If you were overcharged or harmed by Crepe Erase products, options still exist — including complaints to the FTC, state AG offices, and potentially joining future class actions.
What Is the Crepe Erase Lawsuit About?
Background of the Product and Company
Crepe Erase is an anti-aging skincare line manufactured and sold by Guthy-Renker LLC, a California-based direct-to-consumer marketing company founded in 1988. Guthy-Renker is best known for launching Proactiv and uses the same infomercial-driven sales model for Crepe Erase — heavy celebrity endorsements (including Jane Seymour and Dorothy Hamill), late-night TV ads, and online promotions targeting women over 40. The product markets itself as clinically able to “reverse” the look of crepey skin using a patented TruFirm Complex of plant-based extracts including apple, dill, and sage.
Consumer complaints started accumulating almost immediately after the product launched. The pattern was consistent: buyers thought they were purchasing a one-time trial kit at a modest price, only to find themselves enrolled in a monthly auto-shipment program charging $40–$80 per month. When they tried to cancel, they ran into barriers — unhelpful customer service, continued charges, and denied refunds after the 60-day window expired. As of late 2025, the BBB has recorded 72 complaints about Crepe Erase in a three-year period alone.
The Core Issues
The legal disputes around Crepe Erase break into three distinct categories. First is the false advertising complaint — that Guthy-Renker made clinical claims about Crepe Erase that its evidence didn’t fully support, particularly the word “reverse” applied to crepey skin. The National Advertising Division (NAD) investigated this in 2019, found some claims went too far, but the company successfully appealed to the NARB, which upheld most of the advertising with a minor disclosure requirement for before/after photos.
Second is the auto-renewal billing issue, which is where the real confirmed legal liability lies. Multiple class actions and a government enforcement action documented that Guthy-Renker enrolled consumers in recurring subscriptions without adequate disclosure and made cancellation deliberately difficult. These resulted in confirmed, closed settlements exceeding $23 million.
Third is a growing number of skin irritation claims, with consumers reporting rashes, burns, and allergic reactions after using Crepe Erase products. These claims have been discussed in legal filings and consumer forums but have not yet resulted in a confirmed, approved class settlement specifically for Crepe Erase injury claims.
Timeline of Key Legal Events
| Date | Event | Details |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | First major class action filed | Habelito v. Guthy-Renker LLC — California class action over Proactiv auto-renewal billing. Plaintiff Jennifer Habelito alleged inadequate disclosure of subscription terms. |
| 2014–2016 | Discovery and litigation | Evidence gathered on Guthy-Renker’s billing practices across Proactiv and related products, including Crepe Erase. |
| Early 2017 | $15.2M settlement preliminarily approved | Guthy-Renker agreed to pay $15.2 million. Class included California consumers who bought Proactiv between Jan. 2009 and July 2014 and were auto-enrolled in subscription billing. |
| April 17, 2017 | Opt-out / objection deadline | Last day for class members to exclude themselves or object to the Habelito settlement. |
| July 2017 | Settlement checks mailed | Class members began receiving checks of $20–$68.51 or $75 product credits. This settlement is now closed. |
| August 2019 | NAD investigation of Crepe Erase ads | The National Advertising Division found some Crepe Erase claims (including “reverse crepey skin”) were not fully supported. Guthy-Renker appealed. |
| February 2019 | $8.5M government settlement | LA County District Attorney announced an $8.5M settlement with Guthy-Renker over auto-renewal billing for Wen (post-May 2012) and Proactiv (July 2014–Aug. 2016) customers. Guthy-Renker required to overhaul billing disclosures. |
| December 17, 2019 | NARB upholds most Crepe Erase ad claims | Five-person NARB panel sided with Guthy-Renker on core performance claims but recommended clear time disclosures on all before/after photos. |
| 2021–2022 | Further complaint-driven settlements | Reports of additional individual and small class settlements related to ongoing billing issues, without admission of fault. |
| 2023–2025 | Ongoing consumer complaints | Consumer forums, BBB, and FTC complaint databases continue showing billing and product complaints about Crepe Erase under Guthy-Renker. |
| 2026 | No open active settlement currently | As of February 2026, no court-approved class settlement specifically for Crepe Erase products is accepting new claims. Litigation and individual complaints continue. |
Confirmed Settlements — What Actually Happened
⚠️ Important Clarification Several websites imply you can “file a claim” for a Crepe Erase settlement today. As of February 2026, no such open claim period exists. The confirmed settlements below are closed. Understanding them helps you know your rights if a future settlement opens.
Settlement 1: Habelito v. Guthy-Renker (The Proactiv Auto-Renewal Case)
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Case Name | Habelito v. Guthy-Renker LLC |
| Filed | 2013 in California |
| Settlement Amount | $15.2 million |
| Who Was Covered | California residents who bought Proactiv from Guthy-Renker between January 22, 2009 and July 8, 2014 and were auto-enrolled in recurring billing |
| What Class Members Received | Cash payments of $20–$75 OR free skincare products worth at least $75 |
| Deadline to File | April 17, 2017 (CLOSED) |
| Checks Mailed | July 2017 — reported checks of up to $68.51 |
| Status | Closed. No new claims accepted. |
Settlement 2: California AG / LA DA Enforcement Action
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Announced By | LA County District Attorney Jackie Lacey, February 4, 2019 |
| Settlement Amount | $8.5 million |
| Products Covered | Wen hair care and Proactiv (and related Guthy-Renker products) |
| Who Was Covered | Wen customers charged after May 2012; Proactiv customers charged between July 2014 – August 2016 |
| Allegations | Unlawful automatic payment renewals without proper disclosure or consent |
| Requirements on Company | Must clearly disclose auto-renewal terms, get separate checkbox consent, send summary of terms after payment |
| Status | Closed. Restitution notices were mailed to affected customers. |
Combined Settlement Picture
| Settlement | Amount | Period Covered | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Habelito v. Guthy-Renker (Proactiv auto-billing) | $15.2 million | Jan. 2009 – July 2014 | Closed (2017) |
| CA AG / LA DA enforcement (Wen + Proactiv billing) | $8.5 million | May 2012 – Aug. 2016 | Closed (2019) |
| Crepe Erase-specific class settlement | Not confirmed | N/A | No open settlement as of Feb. 2026 |
What Are the Specific Allegations Against Guthy-Renker and Crepe Erase?

1. Deceptive Advertising Claims
Plaintiffs and regulators have alleged that Crepe Erase’s marketing created unrealistic, scientifically unsupported expectations. Key disputed claims included that the product could “reverse crepey-looking skin” and that before/after photos reflected typical results. The NAD in 2019 found that the word “reverse” overstated what the clinical data actually showed — the studies supported improvement in the look of crepey skin, not its elimination or near-elimination. The company appealed, and the NARB largely sided with Guthy-Renker, requiring only that all before/after comparisons include a clear disclosure of how long the product was used.
The practical consumer harm: many buyers reported that after spending hundreds of dollars, they saw little to no visible difference in their skin. Whether that constitutes actionable false advertising remains contested — Guthy-Renker consistently argues that results naturally vary between individuals and that its promotional materials align with industry norms. Method Body Wash Lawsuit
2. Unauthorized and Predatory Subscription Billing
This is where confirmed, concrete legal liability has landed. Courts and enforcement agencies found that Guthy-Renker enrolled consumers in recurring shipment programs without adequately disclosing the auto-renewal terms. When people tried to cancel, they encountered:
- Long hold times and ineffective customer service
- Continued charges even after requesting cancellation
- Refund denials citing the 60-day money-back window, which had often passed by the time consumers realized they were being billed
- Unintelligible invoice language that obscured the recurring nature of the charge
- As recently as late 2025, BBB complaints describe an automated chatbot handling cancellation requests, with real charges continuing
3. Skin Irritation and Adverse Reactions
A separate category of complaints involves physical harm. Some consumers reported rashes, burning sensations, and allergic reactions after using Crepe Erase products. These claims focus on two sub-issues: that the reactions were caused by specific product ingredients, and that Guthy-Renker failed to disclose potential adverse effects clearly in its marketing. Medical intervention was reportedly needed in some cases. These claims have not yet resulted in a confirmed class settlement, though individual lawsuits have been filed.
Summary of Allegations
| Allegation | Legal Basis | Confirmed Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Deceptive auto-renewal billing enrollment | Violation of California Automatic Renewal Law; unfair business practices | Confirmed — $15.2M + $8.5M settlements |
| Misleading “reverse crepey skin” advertising claim | False advertising under Lanham Act / FTC Act / state consumer protection | Partially upheld by NAD; NARB sided with company on appeal |
| Exaggerated or non-representative before/after photos | Deceptive advertising | NARB required time disclosures; no financial settlement |
| Skin irritation / failure to disclose adverse effects | Product liability; failure to warn | Ongoing — no confirmed class settlement as of 2026 |
| Difficulty canceling subscription | Unfair business practices | Addressed by 2019 CA settlement; behavioral changes required |
Who May Qualify for Future Compensation?
Quick Answer Because no active Crepe Erase-specific settlement is currently open, there’s no formal eligibility checklist to run through right now. However, if a settlement opens, the people most likely to qualify are those who purchased Crepe Erase, were enrolled in an unauthorized auto-renewal, were denied a refund, or experienced adverse skin reactions — and who have documentation of these experiences.
Who Would Likely Qualify if a Settlement Opens
| Your Situation | Likely Eligibility | Documentation to Keep |
|---|---|---|
| Charged for auto-renewals you didn’t knowingly consent to | Strong — this is the core of past settlements | Bank/credit card statements showing recurring charges |
| Denied a refund after timely cancellation attempts | Strong — documented pattern of consumer harm | Emails, chat transcripts, phone call logs with dates |
| Experienced skin irritation or adverse reaction | Moderate — depends on future case scope | Medical records, photos of reaction, product purchase receipt |
| Product did not deliver results as advertised | Weaker — advertising claims were largely upheld by NARB | Purchase receipts, screenshots of ads you relied on |
| Never received product despite being charged | Strong — straightforward billing fraud claim | Order confirmations, charge records, correspondence |
Who Would Likely NOT Qualify
- People who knowingly signed up for the subscription, used products, and simply want a refund for results they didn’t like
- Those who have already received settlement compensation through the prior Habelito or CA AG settlements for the same transactions
- Buyers outside the time periods covered by any applicable settlement
- People with no documentation of harm and no records of purchase
Documents to Preserve Right Now
| Document | Why It Matters | Where to Find It |
|---|---|---|
| Credit card / bank statements | Proves unauthorized charges and amounts | Online banking portal; request up to 7 years from your bank |
| Order confirmation emails | Shows what you agreed to purchase | Your email inbox; search “Guthy-Renker” or “Crepe Erase” |
| Cancellation attempt records | Proves you tried to stop being billed | Email, chat transcripts, written notes of phone calls with dates/times |
| Screenshots of ads seen before purchasing | Establishes what claims influenced your decision | Wayback Machine (web.archive.org) if no longer live |
| Medical records (if skin reaction) | Establishes physical harm for injury claims | Your doctor or urgent care clinic |
| Photos of skin reactions | Corroborates injury claims | Your phone camera; date-stamp if possible |
Current Lawsuit Status — 2026 Update

What’s Confirmed Right Now
As of February 2026, the litigation landscape around Crepe Erase and Guthy-Renker looks like this: the two major class settlements from 2017 and 2019 are fully closed — if you were eligible and didn’t file in time, those windows are gone. However, consumer complaints remain active and accumulating. The BBB continues to receive complaints from Guthy-Renker customers across its product lines (including Crepe Erase and Perricone MD, which it also distributes), with a recurring complaint pattern around the same auto-shipment billing issue that triggered the previous settlements.
What this suggests is a real risk of future litigation. Guthy-Renker agreed to change its business practices as part of the 2019 settlement — if those changes haven’t been maintained (and current BBB complaints suggest they may not have been), a new class action or government enforcement action is plausible.
The Advertising Review Outcome — Important Context
One thing that differs from how some sites describe the Crepe Erase lawsuit: the product’s advertising claims were largely defended successfully. The NARB’s December 2019 ruling upheld Guthy-Renker’s core claims about Crepe Erase’s effectiveness, including that clinical studies supported improvement in skin firmness and texture after 4 weeks of use. The company was only required to add time disclosures to before/after comparisons. This doesn’t mean the product works for everyone, but it does mean winning a false-advertising class action specifically over efficacy claims would be difficult.
Guthy-Renker’s Current Position
The company has consistently denied wrongdoing in all settlements, settling without admitting fault. It has publicly maintained that Crepe Erase meets advertised claims and that its subscription terms comply with applicable law. However, the pattern of consumer complaints documented through the BBB, consumer forums, and ongoing court filings tells a different story for many buyers — particularly around the subscription cancellation experience.
What to Watch For
- A new class action specifically targeting Crepe Erase billing or skin injury claims — law firms monitor BBB and consumer complaint databases for exactly this kind of pattern
- FTC or state AG enforcement — the FTC has been increasingly aggressive about automatic renewal violations under the “Click to Cancel” rule finalized in 2024
- Individual settlements — even without a class action, attorneys may pursue individual claims on a contingency basis for consumers with significant documented losses
What You Can Do Right Now If You Were Harmed
✅ You Have Real Options Even Without an Open Settlement A formal class settlement isn’t your only path to compensation. Here are concrete steps that have worked for other consumers dealing with Guthy-Renker billing issues.
Step 1: Document Everything You Have
Before anything else, pull together your purchase history, bank statements showing charges, and any communication with the company. Screenshot or print everything. Even a few months of documented unauthorized charges can add up to a meaningful refund claim.
Step 2: Contact Guthy-Renker Directly (In Writing)
Call 1-800-556-7835 or use the Crepe Erase website’s chat/contact form, but always follow up in writing. A written cancellation request creates a paper trail. State clearly: you are canceling, you want confirmation, and you want a refund for any charges made after your cancellation date. Keep copies of everything.
Step 3: Dispute Charges with Your Credit Card Company
If you were charged without consent, you have chargeback rights under the Fair Credit Billing Act. Contact your bank or credit card issuer and dispute the unauthorized charges. You typically have 60–120 days from the statement date, so act quickly. Successful chargebacks are reported: Guthy-Renker has in some cases declined to contest chargebacks rather than defend them.
Step 4: File a Complaint with the FTC
Go to reportfraud.ftc.gov and submit a detailed complaint. The FTC tracks complaint patterns and has taken action against Guthy-Renker before. Your complaint adds to the record that can trigger future enforcement. This costs nothing and takes about 10 minutes.
Step 5: File a Complaint with Your State Attorney General
All 50 states have consumer protection divisions that handle subscription billing complaints. Many will contact the company on your behalf. Find your AG’s office at naag.org.
Step 6: File a BBB Complaint
The BBB at bbb.org isn’t a government agency, but companies with Guthy-Renker’s profile often respond to BBB complaints because unresolved complaints affect their rating. Many consumers report getting partial refunds after escalating through BBB.
Step 7: Contact a Consumer Rights Attorney
If your losses exceed a few hundred dollars, a free consultation with a class action attorney is worth pursuing. Many take consumer protection cases on contingency — meaning you pay nothing unless they recover money. Look for attorneys handling auto-renewal cases or FTC Act violations in your state.
Step 8: Monitor Class Action Tracking Sites
Sites like TopClassActions.com and ClassAction.org track new filings. Set up a free account and watch for any new Guthy-Renker or Crepe Erase class action. If one opens, you’ll get notified and can file a claim within the designated window. Fairlife Lawsuit
Filing Deadlines to Know
| Action | Time Limit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Credit card chargeback | 60–120 days from statement date | Varies by card issuer; act immediately if charges are recent |
| FTC complaint | No deadline | File anytime; earlier is better for pattern-tracking purposes |
| State AG complaint | No deadline for filing a complaint | Statute of limitations for your underlying claim may vary by state |
| Consumer protection lawsuit (CA) | 4 years from discovery of harm | Under California UCL; other states vary |
| Fraud claim | 3–6 years depending on state | Consult an attorney for your specific state |
| Joining a future class action | Set by court when case is filed | Sign up for alerts at TopClassActions.com and ClassAction.org |
How This Compares to Similar Cases
Guthy-Renker is Not Alone in This Pattern
The Crepe Erase situation fits into a recognizable pattern of infomercial-brand litigation that consumer rights attorneys and regulators have pursued across the beauty industry. The combination of celebrity-endorsed claims, subscription-billing traps, and difficult cancellations has produced significant settlements across multiple companies.
| Case | Settlement Amount | Core Issue | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guthy-Renker (Proactiv billing) — Habelito | $15.2 million | Auto-renewal billing without consent (CA consumers) | Closed 2017 |
| Guthy-Renker (CA AG enforcement — Wen + Proactiv) | $8.5 million | Unlawful automatic payment renewals | Closed 2019 |
| WEN Hair Care (Guthy-Renker) | $26 million (FDA also involved) | Hair loss, scalp injuries, failure to warn; billing issues | Closed ~2020 |
| Rodan + Fields Lash Boost | $38 million | Failure to disclose ingredient side effects (prostaglandin analog) | Closed 2020 |
| Meaningful Beauty (Cindy Crawford / Guthy-Renker) | Confidential settlements | Auto-billing complaints | Multiple individual cases, ongoing |
The WEN Hair Care case is especially instructive here. WEN is also a Guthy-Renker product, and its settlement of $26 million — plus FDA involvement — came from consumers documenting consistent patterns of hair loss and scalp damage. The Crepe Erase skin irritation claims haven’t yet reached that scale of litigation, but the organizational structure is identical: same parent company, same sales model, same complaint types.
What Makes the Crepe Erase Situation Unique
Three factors set Crepe Erase apart from many comparable cases. First, Guthy-Renker actually won the NARB appeal on its advertising claims — meaning the product’s core efficacy marketing has more legal cover than typical class action targets. Second, the target demographic (women over 40 seeking anti-aging solutions) makes these consumers particularly susceptible to emotional purchase decisions driven by before/after photos and celebrity endorsement, a factor courts have considered in evaluating the sophistication of the affected class. Third, the ongoing failure to fully implement disclosed billing reforms — evidenced by continued BBB complaints as recently as late 2025 — creates real potential for a renewed enforcement action.
Do You Need a Lawyer?
Quick Answer For chargebacks and FTC complaints, no — you can do those yourself at no cost. For significant losses (over $200–$500) or skin injury claims, a free consultation with a consumer rights attorney is worth your time. Class actions are typically handled on contingency, meaning no upfront cost.
When You Can Handle It Yourself
Chargebacks through your bank, complaints to the FTC or BBB, and contacting Guthy-Renker customer service are all things you can do without legal help. These are free, straightforward, and often effective for small billing disputes. Many consumers recover unauthorized charges through these channels alone.
When an Attorney Adds Real Value
Consider getting a free consultation if: your total losses exceed a few hundred dollars; you suffered a physical skin reaction requiring medical care; you were charged repeatedly over many months despite documented cancellation attempts; or you’re considering initiating or joining a class action. Consumer protection attorneys who handle these cases typically work on contingency — they take a percentage of any recovery and charge nothing if they don’t win.
To find a consumer rights attorney in your area, the National Association of Consumer Advocates (NACA) at consumeradvocates.org maintains a searchable directory of vetted attorneys who handle auto-renewal and false advertising cases.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Crepe Erase lawsuit?
Quick Answer The term refers to multiple consumer legal actions against Guthy-Renker LLC, the company that makes Crepe Erase, over deceptive advertising, unauthorized subscription billing, and skin injury claims.
The Crepe Erase lawsuit isn’t a single case but a broader pattern of legal conflict. Past confirmed settlements resolved billing complaints. Advertising claims were largely defended successfully in regulatory review. Skin injury claims are ongoing but haven’t produced a confirmed class settlement yet.
Is there an active Crepe Erase class action settlement I can file a claim for right now?
Quick Answer No. As of February 2026, there is no open, court-approved Crepe Erase settlement accepting new claims.
Websites that suggest otherwise are either describing the closed 2017 settlement (which no longer accepts claims) or are publishing inaccurate information. If a settlement opens, it will be announced on sites like TopClassActions.com and ClassAction.org, and class members will typically receive mailed notice.
How much did Guthy-Renker pay in settlements related to Crepe Erase and its products?
Quick Answer Confirmed settlements include $15.2 million (Habelito class action, 2017) and $8.5 million (CA AG enforcement action, 2019), totaling over $23 million — plus WEN settlements of approximately $26 million.
Who is Guthy-Renker and why does it keep getting sued?
Guthy-Renker is a California-based direct-to-consumer marketing company founded in 1988. It’s known for launching Proactiv, WEN Hair Care, Meaningful Beauty, and Crepe Erase using the infomercial model. That model — celebrity endorsement, dramatic before/afters, and a low-cost introductory offer that auto-enrolls buyers in subscriptions — is also the source of virtually all its legal problems. The company has faced repeated legal action over its subscription billing practices across multiple product lines.
What were the before/after photos in Crepe Erase ads about legally?
The NAD in 2019 found that some before/after photos depicted results that were not representative of what typical consumers could expect. However, Guthy-Renker appealed, and the NARB sided with the company, determining the photos didn’t exaggerate performance. The only requirement was that all such comparisons clearly disclose how long the product was used (e.g., “after 30 days”).
What should I do if I was charged for Crepe Erase subscriptions I didn’t authorize?
Act quickly: dispute the charges with your credit card company (within 60–120 days of the charge), file a complaint with the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov, and file a BBB complaint. Put everything in writing. If your losses are significant, consult a consumer rights attorney — many handle billing disputes on contingency.
Did Crepe Erase actually cause skin reactions?
There are documented consumer complaints about rashes, burning, and allergic reactions after using Crepe Erase products. Whether these reactions were caused by specific ingredients or were individual sensitivities hasn’t been definitively established in court. If you experienced a skin reaction, document it medically and consult an attorney about whether a product liability claim is viable.
Can I still get compensation from the 2017 Proactiv settlement?
No. The Habelito settlement claims deadline was April 17, 2017. Checks were mailed in July 2017. That case is fully closed. The same applies to the 2019 CA AG settlement — the restitution process for that one has concluded.
Can I sue Guthy-Renker on my own without joining a class action?
Yes. Individual lawsuits are possible, especially in small claims court for billing disputes (often up to $10,000 depending on your state). For larger claims involving physical injury, an attorney can file an individual suit. The statutes of limitations vary by state and claim type, so don’t wait indefinitely.
How do I cancel my Crepe Erase subscription and actually make it stick?
Call 1-800-556-7835 and request cancellation, then immediately follow up in writing via email or the website contact form. Screenshot your confirmation. Monitor your bank statements for the next 1–2 billing cycles. If charges continue, dispute them immediately with your bank and keep your documentation. Under California law (and the 2019 settlement terms), Guthy-Renker is required to honor cancellation requests promptly.
What is Guthy-Renker’s refund policy for Crepe Erase?
Guthy-Renker advertises a 60-day money-back guarantee. However, a common complaint pattern is that by the time consumers realize they’re on a subscription, the 60-day window has passed. If you’re outside that window, you may still have recourse through chargebacks, BBB complaints, or state consumer protection agencies, especially if you can show you attempted to cancel before the 60-day deadline.
What did the FTC’s “Click to Cancel” rule change?
The FTC’s Click to Cancel rule, finalized in 2024 and effective in 2025, requires that companies make canceling a subscription at least as easy as signing up for one. This directly addresses the kind of barrier that generated Guthy-Renker complaints. If you tried to cancel Crepe Erase and found it unreasonably difficult after 2025, that’s now explicitly an FTC violation you can report.
Is Crepe Erase still on the market?
Yes. Crepe Erase continues to be sold through Guthy-Renker’s website, infomercials, and third-party retailers including Amazon, QVC, Walmart, and Ulta Beauty. The product itself isn’t banned or recalled — the legal issues relate to billing practices and advertising claims, not product safety in the regulatory sense.
Where can I find official updates if a new Crepe Erase settlement is filed?
The most reliable sources are: PACER (pacer.gov) for federal court filings; your state court’s public records portal; TopClassActions.com; and ClassAction.org. You can also sign up for free email alerts on these sites. Any approved settlement will also involve direct notice to class members by mail, so keep your address current with your bank and any previous order records.
Do I need a receipt to file a claim if a settlement opens?
Not necessarily. Credit card and bank statements showing charges from Guthy-Renker are typically accepted as proof of purchase in consumer billing settlements. Email order confirmations, shipping notifications, or even screenshots of subscription charges have been accepted in similar cases. Keep whatever you have.
What’s the statute of limitations on consumer protection claims against Guthy-Renker?
This varies by state. In California — where Guthy-Renker is based and where previous suits were filed — the statute of limitations for unfair business practices under the UCL is 4 years from when you discovered or reasonably should have discovered the harm. For fraud claims it’s typically 3 years. Other states range from 2 to 6 years. Consult an attorney in your state if you’re concerned about timing.
Has the government gotten involved in the Crepe Erase situation?
Yes — the LA County District Attorney’s office, working with the California Auto Renewal Task Force, brought the enforcement action that produced the $8.5 million settlement in 2019. This was a government enforcement action, not just a private lawsuit. The FTC also has jurisdiction over deceptive subscription practices and has been increasingly active in this space following the Click to Cancel rule.
The Bottom Line
The Crepe Erase lawsuit — accurately understood — is a story about a company with a documented pattern of subscription billing abuses that resulted in over $23 million in confirmed settlements. Those specific cases are closed. But consumer complaints continue, the FTC has new tools to address exactly this kind of conduct, and the legal record suggests future class actions are possible.
If you were harmed by Crepe Erase — whether through unauthorized billing, difficulty canceling, or a skin reaction — you’re not without options. Chargebacks, FTC complaints, and BBB complaints cost nothing and frequently produce results. For larger losses, a consumer rights attorney consultation is free and could open more substantial avenues.
What you shouldn’t do is pay anyone to “get you into” a Crepe Erase settlement. Any legitimate class action settlement will provide free claim filing for eligible consumers. Stay skeptical of sites implying an open claim portal that doesn’t exist — and bookmark this page for updates as litigation in this space continues to develop.
This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe you have a legal claim, consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. Settlement information is based on court records and confirmed news sources; readers should verify current status before taking action.
